Shanghai Sunland Industrial Co., Ltd is the top manufacturer of Personal Protect Equipment in China, with 20 years’experience. We are the Chinese government appointed manufacturer for government power,personal protection equipment , medical instruments,construction industry, etc. All the products get the CE, ANSI and related Industry Certificates. All our safety helmets use the top-quality raw material without any recycling material.
Teaching plan of small safety helmet
We provide exclusive customization of the products logo, using advanced printing technology and technology, not suitable for fading, solid and firm, scratch-proof and anti-smashing, and suitable for various scenes such as construction, mining, warehouse, inspection, etc. Our goal is to satisfy your needs. Demand, do your best.
Professional team work and production line which can make nice quality in short time..
The professional team provides 24 * 7 after-sales service for you, which can help you solve any problems
29/1/2014, · 3. Snell (Snell Memorial Foundation M2010) ,Helmet Standard,: The Snell Memorial Foundation is a private, non-profit organization formed in 1957 dedicated to improving ,helmet safety,. Snell goes beyond the governmental ,standard,-setting approach and is available to assist manufacturers with ,helmet, development by offering prototype ,testing,.
(Safety Helmet Assessment Rating Program) is the new kid on the block. This safety standard does not certify helmets but rather assigns star ratings to helmets that have already passed ECE certification. It is meant to serve as a rating enhancement and indicates a …
Safety Helmet Types: The CSA Standard (Z94.1) tests for Type 1 and Type 2 safety helmets include dielectric strength, impact attenuation, penetration resistance, passive retention, shell flammability, and liner ignition resistance (typically only Type 2 for lateral impact).
The ECE 220.5 ,standard, is the minimum certification a ,helmet, must have in order to be legal on the public roads of Europe. Similar to DOT ,standards,, the ECE rating consists of several tests designed to ,test, the overall ,safety, of a ,helmet,. Although similar, there are noticeable differences that arguably make achieving the ECE ,standard, more desirable than FMVSS 218. Click to learn more!
ECE ,standard, requires impact ,testing, at higher velocities than the DOT ,standard,; therefore not all DOT certified motorcycle ,helmets, will pass the ECE ,standard,. One advantage that the ECE 22.05 ,standard, has is the mandatory batch ,testing, of ,helmets, before they are released to the riding public. This means that quality of the motorcycle ,helmets, ...
This is a major update of fundamental, cross-industry guidance on ,pressure testing,. Aimed at all employers, supervisors and managers responsible for ,pressure testing,, the principal ,standards, remain unchanged, but it updates, corrects and clarifies requirements from the previous edition.
Singapore Motorcycle ,Helmet Safety Standard, In Singapore, motorcycle riders caught wearing unapproved ,helmets, can be fined by the Singapore Traffic Police or LTA (LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY). A motorcyclist can only compare the protection of a motorcycle ,helmet, by ensuring that the relevant ,safety standards, have been met
Over 50 countries have adopted this helmet safety protocol and favor energy absorbing helmets like that of the DOT standards. The most current safety standard is the ECE 22.05. What is the difference between ECE and DOT? All tests for the ECE are pretty much identical aside from a slight difference in the amount of energy source for impact testing.
Pressure testing, is a very small part of each of these ,standards,. For example, ASME B31.1 – 2012 Power Piping covers the ,testing, procedures for hydrostatic and pneumatic tests in only two pages. The emphasis is on the process of ,pressure testing,, rather than on ,pressure testing safety,. To bridge the gap, this publication focuses on safe work
Most require identity of helmet under test, details of headform, number of standard, and performance data such as degree of penetration, deflection of visor in mm, whether or not positioning test band was obscured or exposed during test, elongation of strap, headform acceleration at intervals specified in standard, details of damage to helmet and its components.